A random sea characterised by a Pierson-Moskowitz wave spectrum, with a Hs of 5m and a Tz of 7s, is specified. BCs are unchanged and carry through automatically from the current analysis. A 3-hour simulation is performed with a relatively large time-step of 2.5s – the vessel response rather than the response of the mooring system is the primary output of interest. The vessel response in all translational and rotational degrees of freedom is in fact automatically output to a file with the extension .mor for subsequent use in the Phase 2 dynamic analysis.
A piecewise linear current is applied to the mooring system. The current is ramped on over ten increments. Boundary conditions are unchanged and carry through from the initial static phase. Note that it is necessary to run this analysis from 1s to 20001 (in steps of 2000s), in order to have the subsequent dynamic analysis start at the same time as the dynamic analysis of Phase 1: otherwise the second order motions from Phase 1 will not be applied.
The same wave parameters as were specified in the Phase 1 dynamic analysis are naturally repeated here. Vessel timetrace drift motions are now specified, with the actual timetrace file being the .mor file from the Phase 1 dynamic. Purely for efficiency reasons, the time domain simulation is analysed for 1 hour only, whereas a 3 hour simulation would generally be considered recommended practice.
Note that is not necessary to apply the mean vessel offset from the Phase 1 wind and current analysis as a static offset in Phase 2 prior to this dynamic run. The mean offset will be the starting point of the drift motions in the timetrace file. However these will be ramped on with the wave loading. So if an offset is specified prior to the dynamic run, it will be immediately removed. So it is better not to apply the offset statically, rather just let it be ramped on in this dynamic phase.